35189 replies to this topic

[Snippit]

Update for ALSI view...   take it or leave it...  No Charge (as always)

 

https://jsecharts.bl...lsi-j203_9.html

 

 

It appears that no charge = no respect (except for failed actors doing a fake sycophant)

 

Receperint est ovium

[JK001]

Sure thing Mr "Newbie" you sure got a hell of a lot to say all of a sudden 

But dude but dude but dudie sucking dude -  you are as FAKE as any con artist I ever did see.

Mr Newbie is but a title the assumed elitist assign to incumbents, not frittered or driven by ego-classifications and thus you can call me any tag you want to. Fortunately you do not know anything about me and we shall keep it that way.

Admiring your artwork, but not subscribing to your abuse and intended insults,, for that you are way to junior in my personality/capability ranking methods and perhaps it worked like that where you grew up (for that I shall excuse you based on limited EQ and upbringing). 

You prefer to be a desert inhabitant and live on your oasis and prefer to see everyone in the world as fake, that is a personal choice I shall adhere to it, but not respect or support/encourage it.

Conclusively you moved from the +1 to the -1 (using your own scoring method) and as a consequence fall into the ignore status.

Appreciate all the learning this far from you and appreciate that you are much more explanatory on your latest charts than before.  Best of luck to you.

[Snippit]

Thanks Snippit,  I am leaning towards impulsive, not because of your chart, but because of positive trend in US on TCEHY and NPSNY supporting your conclusions.  It could turn the other way too tomorrow.  So let's be patient and not become a patient.  Nobody denies your charts are good and respected, but dude, your thinking that people suck up to you for whatever reason is misplaced. It is simply a matter of giving credit where it is due. 

Your are not doing it for free - you are doing it to get your ego embalmed.  I would happily stop saying thank you if you prefer? 

I am not going away, but can easily just view the charts, compare to my own amateur but progressing attempts,  and let you drown in your isolation, just not the way I was brought up.  Your choice.

 

Sure thing Mr "Newbie" you sure got a hell of a lot to say all of a sudden 

But dude but dude but dudie sucking dude -  you are as FAKE as any con artist I ever did see.

[JK001]

Update for ALSI view...   take it or leave it...  No Charge (as always)

 

https://jsecharts.bl...lsi-j203_9.html

 

 

It appears that no charge = no respect (except for failed actors doing a fake sycophant)

 

Thanks Snippit,  I am leaning towards impulsive, not because of your chart, but because of positive trend in US on TCEHY and NPSNY supporting your conclusions.  It could turn the other way too tomorrow.  So let's be patient and not become a patient.  Nobody denies your charts are good and respected, but dude, your thinking that people suck up to you for whatever reason is misplaced. It is simply a matter of giving credit where it is due. 

Your are not doing it for free - you are doing it to get your ego embalmed.  I would happily stop saying thank you if you prefer? 

I am not going away, but can easily just view the charts, compare to my own amateur but progressing attempts,  and let you drown in your isolation, just not the way I was brought up.  Your choice.

[Snippit]

Update for ALSI view...   take it or leave it...  No Charge (as always)

 

https://jsecharts.bl...lsi-j203_9.html

 

 

It appears that no charge = no respect (except for failed actors doing a fake sycophant)

 

 

 

 

 

 

[JK001]

Snippit, since you occasionally loose your circus music, thought I might put a smile on your face and give you a lighter version.

https://www.youtube....h?v=psxytsKUlK8

 

[JK001]

Tencent closes the gap as expected.

 

My view is that for the debate to turn into abc, ALSI still need to go down to 51622 for it to be below (i), currently closed at about 1% above that.   Tomorrow is earnings date for Tencent, exceed expectations may then align with your upside numbering, alternatively back to the alphabet.

[Snippit]

Tencent closes the gap as expected.

 

Check the debate:  https://jsecharts.bl...lsi-j203_9.html

...

The Tencent pointer for gap closing took form earlier as the 2nd gap started closing and looking for c=2a. 

Tencent has some positive divergence also. 

 

[Snippit]

S&P 500 index artwork...

 

https://wavecount.bl...-500-index.html

 

 

Nulla intentio criminalibus

Non spectaculum circi

[Snippit]

In your view...but so far so good, working better than your pure EW...!

 

Polly and I already shared our signals but you don't bother to learn so why post it...again!

 

A

 

What signals? An unexplained prediction is hardly a signal. If you gave the full story behind the system being used then altruism would be your middle name.

"Polly" claims to be the professional, so surely the system belongs to a professional trading outfit. Do they condone your use of their system in this way? 

Which company did you say you work for?

[Argento]

I find it quite amusing to see grand announcements of what will come to pass without any reference to what it is that causes such a profound need to share the result of the experiment but not the method by which it should be conducted.

Its all just basically non-scientific and thereby seemingly supported by only by the mumblings of the lady in the fortune teller tent. 

Now where did I put that circus music?

In your view...but so far so good, working better than your pure EW...!

 

Polly and I already shared our signals but you don't bother to learn so why post it...again!

 

A

[Snippit]

Wave B should go down towards 2705 and then bounce back into thanksgiving, Caldaro's first choice is the B down and C for tiny higher high as A before US makes a new low headed into early next year!Normally the case with these mini bear markets...need those divergences to develop!

 

ALSI setting herself up for big waves but expect a lower low and then biiiig bounce into last week of November, she is going to get wild!

 

A

 

I find it quite amusing to see grand announcements of what will come to pass without any reference to what it is that causes such a profound need to share the result of the experiment but not the method by which it should be conducted.

Its all just basically non-scientific and thereby seemingly supported by only by the mumblings of the lady in the fortune teller tent. 

Now where did I put that circus music?

[Argento]

Glad to have an accademic interest......Let me clarify my question.....Read Caldaro carefully......Initially he was counting 5 waves up to 737.......the explanation then continues ...with pullback ......then up ...pullback then up ...to 815.......BUT THEN......IN HIND SITE .....the way I understand it .......concludes that the entire move was a zig zag.....SEEMINGLY abandoning the impulsive count to 737.......That is how I understand him.....Snippit counted differently to Caldaro....check wavecount and Jack Lad........How do you see it  ?........AND WHY ?........AM I INTERPRETING HIS EXPLANATION CORRECTLY ? Interesting is .....that even now they are holding around 780.......If back up now ...over 815......B gets more complicated.....which then takes us back to the impulsive count to 737.......Then this might NOT be a simple zig zag.......What do you think ?

Wave B should go down towards 2705 and then bounce back into thanksgiving, Caldaro's first choice is the B down and C for tiny higher high as A before US makes a new low headed into early next year!Normally the case with these mini bear markets...need those divergences to develop!

 

ALSI setting herself up for big waves but expect a lower low and then biiiig bounce into last week of November, she is going to get wild!

 

A

[Snippit]

Don't understand you guys, so Snippit indicates a wave IV ended so wave V up on ALSI, and Caldaro posted an A on their rally meaning the US is on its way down for a B, so with ALSI already making a lower low this morning it means we going down too, why go against Caldaro anyway!

 

A

 

Check the debate:  https://jsecharts.bl...lsi-j203_9.html

The iv is a reference point on an evolving (unconfirmed) pattern hiding in plain sight.

I see a push/pull on the ALSI between the island reversal and divergence. Caldaro is your friends issue, not mine. 

Nonetheless Caldaro writes of uncertainty with some variables and allows for more upside before the turn. 

The Tencent pointer for gap closing took form earlier as the 2nd gap started closing and looking for c=2a. 

Tencent has some positive divergence also. 

The ALSI has been in a bear since January. It is far more mature than the US. Plenty of room for further disparate maneuvers. 

[Phoenix...]

Don't understand you guys, so Snippit indicates a wave IV ended so wave V up on ALSI, and Caldaro posted an A on their rally meaning the US is on its way down for a B, so with ALSI already making a lower low this morning it means we going down too, why go against Caldaro anyway!

 

A

Glad to have an accademic interest......Let me clarify my question.....Read Caldaro carefully......Initially he was counting 5 waves up to 737.......the explanation then continues ...with pullback ......then up ...pullback then up ...to 815.......BUT THEN......IN HIND SITE .....the way I understand it .......concludes that the entire move was a zig zag.....SEEMINGLY abandoning the impulsive count to 737.......That is how I understand him.....Snippit counted differently to Caldaro....check wavecount and Jack Lad........How do you see it  ?........AND WHY ?........AM I INTERPRETING HIS EXPLANATION CORRECTLY ? Interesting is .....that even now they are holding around 780.......If back up now ...over 815......B gets more complicated.....which then takes us back to the impulsive count to 737.......Then this might NOT be a simple zig zag.......What do you think ?

[Argento]

I did read it .....I am not sure of my interpretation of it......Also ...if the 5 wave count to 737.....should still be concidered ....you could have explained why .......I am not really a poster ....I told you this.....I am not happy with my bad punctution and grammer .....drivel style writing.......So I am not going all over the internet advertising it........Because you are you,.......I know you understand me though.......Last but not least ....had to go via twitter or facebook there.......not in the mood for more accounts ...passwords blaaaaa....blaaa.....blaaa......NOTE THAT EVERY TIME YOU ASK ME THINGS NOT RELATING TO TRADING ......I answer you truthfully......However this should stop.....Surely other people reading here is not interested in who I am or what I am doing here.......SUGGESTION.....So if you need MORE from me .....Ask questions with  yes and No answers......as to not irritate the rest of the people on the site....And as I am not here to write a biography on myself.....With regards to your style of insulting.....It makes me smile.....Feel free to fire away.....not taking it personal......I have empathy with your suspision theory.....I mean no disrespect with this post Sir.....Would really appreciate some education on my actual question....around my interpretation of Tony's take

Don't understand you guys, so Snippit indicates a wave IV ended so wave V up on ALSI, and Caldaro posted an A on their rally meaning the US is on its way down for a B, so with ALSI already making a lower low this morning it means we going down too, why go against Caldaro anyway!

 

A

Edited by Argento, 12 November 2018 - 01:22 PM.

[Phoenix...]

Non computato. Clearly you did not read the latest Caladaro post. Nor do you attempt to ask him directly via his comments section. What is your issue with asking me to wipe your nose every time it drips with nonsensical aberrations? Anyone would think you have been assigned to distract whilst some underhanded recruitment drive ensues. 

I did read it .....I am not sure of my interpretation of it......Also ...if the 5 wave count to 737.....should still be concidered ....you could have explained why .......I am not really a poster ....I told you this.....I am not happy with my bad punctution and grammer .....drivel style writing.......So I am not going all over the internet advertising it........Because you are you,.......I know you understand me though.......Last but not least ....had to go via twitter or facebook there.......not in the mood for more accounts ...passwords blaaaaa....blaaa.....blaaa......NOTE THAT EVERY TIME YOU ASK ME THINGS NOT RELATING TO TRADING ......I answer you truthfully......However this should stop.....Surely other people reading here is not interested in who I am or what I am doing here.......SUGGESTION.....So if you need MORE from me .....Ask questions with  yes and No answers......as to not irritate the rest of the people on the site....And as I am not here to write a biography on myself.....With regards to your style of insulting.....It makes me smile.....Feel free to fire away.....not taking it personal......I have empathy with your suspision theory.....I mean no disrespect with this post Sir.....Would really appreciate some education on my actual question....around my interpretation of Tony's take

[Snippit]

Good day to you Sir.......Thank you for Alsi chart......May you please verify my interpretation of Tony's short term view......I understand that he says the entire a of B can be concluded...to be a zig zag move......BUT does this then mean that the 5 wave count to 737 gets discarded in his conclusion ? If this is the case I understand correctly.

 

Non computato. Clearly you did not read the latest Caladaro post. Nor do you attempt to ask him directly via his comments section. What is your issue with asking me to wipe your nose every time it drips with nonsensical aberrations? Anyone would think you have been assigned to distract whilst some underhanded recruitment drive ensues. 

[Phoenix...]

Appended a closer look with debate...

 

https://jsecharts.bl...lsi-j203_9.html

 

Good day to you Sir.......Thank you for Alsi chart......May you please verify my interpretation of Tony's short term view......I understand that he says the entire a of B can be concluded...to be a zig zag move......BUT does this then mean that the 5 wave count to 737 gets discarded in his conclusion ? If this is the case I understand correctly.

[Snippit]

Appended a closer look with debate...

 

https://jsecharts.bl...lsi-j203_9.html