I am not sure where ADW fits best for discussion these days? Probably better in “Which is the Next Ten Bagger?” 
I don’t know who of you got to read the article about Ford’s ex-CEO, Alan Mulally a while back? There might have been a few articles written on this, but the one I read was about how he borrowed $23,5 billion during the worldwide economic meltdown and turned Ford into a profitable business. At the end of the interview he was asked how he did it and when I think about his answer, I can’t help thinking that Afdawn is in the same development curve. He said they did it in 5 steps: (1) they faced reality, (2) they then did an honest and realistic assessment, (3) they established a compelling vision for the future, (4) they focussed on what they did best and (5) they plan and implemented.
For Afdawn, step 4 was even bolder – they changed the business model!
There are a few significant things in this story, but without getting too philosophical about all that – Mulally was appointed with Ford in 2006 and retired earlier this year, so it took him a few years to realise this strategy. I think we are too impatient with what’s happening in the company right now. I have said it before, but to change the business model from lender to venture capitalist is easier said than done. It must take time to set-up and get things going. Even with KC on board (or as many would believe: Afdawn on board with KC?!) It does not matter, the two forces are now together and they are going to make things work. I believe the stuff that are being done now is the right things to create that solid base for future operations. If you read what all the economists (Dawie R, Mike S, JP Landman and other finance guru's like Magnus H and Theo V) say, it is that South Africa need more entrepreneurs and this is where the Afdawn/KC combination is going to be “deadly and lethal”.
Yes, they have not done this perfectly and the “no news” was frustrating at times (even I wrote a letter to the CEO), but one thing is sure – they did not do nothing the past few months. The fact that Elite is now a positive income stream is (1) positive and as Battleship rightly said elsewhere, not a handbrake anymore and (2) it really says a lot about whoever did the turn-around. It shows there is good expertise in the company (and a will to turn this thing around!).
Financial statements…well one couldn’t really expect anything different from what it is, could one? It is just not possible to drastically swing this thing around in 6 months. But that will come...
All the developments the past few weeks/days…the DTI, the SARS issue, the cautionary…I cannot help to feel positive about all this.
About the share price…I am not too worried about it for now. Although NAV = ±7c, it is heavily driven by market sentiment. Fact is, volumes are up, many more deals take place per day and a while back that horrible and lengthy trend of 12million shares @ 5c and 6c was broken. That equals upward trend.
I am definitely supporting what’s happening now and my vote at the AGM will be for the board to continue what they do…
Edited by LWVi, 05 December 2014 - 05:58 AM.