=================
Mty final post in this thread :
from
to:
The End of dumping on this forum.....
=================
Hi Polly,
I presume that I am one of those whom you are referring to in the above. (Certainly I was the one who pointed out what you yourself pointed out in the first place about your pension, etc.).
At first, in response to your latest posting, I wanted to provide a detailed, point by point counter-argument or rebuttal, but that probably would would just serve to inflame matters. Suffice to say that I have already posted what I felt about some of your observations. That is history - let us just leave that aside.
I don't want you to stop posting or sharing your views - indeed I do not want ANYONE to stop posting - especially if you have a different view to my own. I love the fact that you have a different take.
My problem is where someone is unable to back their arguments because of a lack the evidence. I then am not able to see this as a form of rational thinking. It is difficult to engage someone who is repeatedly negative and insists that their view is correct without providing the proof. I find it absolutely bizarre that anyone would make investment decisions on a gut feel regarding any company. For me it sounds to much like a palm-reader or one of those charlatans.
For the record, I have not singled you out.
Lionelza1 and I have clashed repeatedly about this. I have argued/challenged/communicated with Tom, Investment Novice, Seeking Knowledge on this Sharenet platform, and various others across the world (including Sarel Oberholzer on Seeking Alpha).
And I do not just do this for opposing views. I often similarly do not agree with people whom I believe are unrealistically over-optimistic.
The reason that I act in this manner, is that I want to understand everything there is to know about Steinhoff - both the good and the bad. I need all of this information to reach an informed investment case, in order to make my own judgement in whether this is a good investment or not.
I am sorry if I am coming across as a "guru" regarding Steinhoff. This is not my intention.
I believe that from from a factual basis, that I do understand this company better than most. I have repeatedly written to Steinhoff where I required further information. In my correspondence on this ShareChat platform, I do like to respond where possible with actual real facts and figures to augment my arguments, and to provide a sense of reference for why I think as I do (that the investment case for Steinhoff is very appealing (for me anyway)).
So, please do not stop posting. I was going to write a similar response to your Great Nemesis when he posted that he was leaving. Thankfully, he returned almost immediately.
Lastly Polly. You have a right to a different opinion. No matter how much I may disagree with it, you have a right to it. This is not apartheid South Africa, or Communist Russia / China where dissenting views are not tolerated, and the "guilty" are sought out and punished. This is a virtual community. Anonymity is almost guaranteed by the fact that we use aliases and avatars.
Incidentally, on this point. It takes a lot of courage to come out and publicly state that you believe that Steinhoff is a good investment. This is what Seeking Alpha's Sarel Oberholzer has done. He has written over the past six months to a year, about the fact that this is a once in a life time opportunity. Many people have challenged him and laughed at him. Yet, no one has yet being able to fundamentally provide an articulate reason why he may be wrong. It takes a lot of courage to write in your personal capacity and open yourself to public ridicule and rebuke.
So Polly, DayTraderDad, LionelZa1, don't be so thin-skinned and sensitive about dissenting views. There will always be other opinions. Use these to ratify or stress test your own arguments. Check if the other person makes sense.
To be successful in investing, you cannot follow the herd. You may as well then buy the index.
The flip-side of the coin though is that ,the risk in going it alone is that you may be making a bad error, and then compounding this. It happens all the time - we are only human. Sarel from Seeking Alpha for example quoted the Steinhoff NAV as €0.54 - it actually is €0.58 - we are human. This was pointed out to him. Thankfully it did not materially change the picture. But, when you are the opposing force, you need to ensure that your views are correct, your numbers check out, and that you have built a significant margin of safety. You will never know if you are incorrect or made a mistake unless someone stress tests and challenges your argument and numbers. I LIVE FOR THAT MOMENT. It is as important in my own investment thinking as almost any other. This is what I do. I do this for a living.
This was a long-winded way of trying to say: I am going to continue to challenge your views (Polly). If I think that you are basing your argument on emotions, I am going to tell you as much (Lionelza1). If I think your numbers are skewed, and that you have misunderstood the debt (DayTraderDad), I will let you know.
If I am wrong, tell me - show me. I will write back and acknowledge the error.
I want you to show me where I am making an error, far, far more than I want you to agree with me. I have nothing, absolutely nothing to gain from you agreeing with me. Yet if I have made an error, you could be saving me millions.
Best Regards
Captainfrom82