now we know why we had a spike yesterday.....Not much volume but I can't remember such climb (€ 0,2367) in Sunday trading hours from 17:00 till 19:00 @ https://www.ls-tc.de...f-int-hld-aktie
Steinhoff
#2921
Posted 06 September 2021 - 09:30 AM
#2922
Posted 06 September 2021 - 09:30 AM
Can you view the court case? If so where, thanks
#2923
Posted 06 September 2021 - 09:15 AM
and they were going to get R15 per share...now they will get over R19...how greedy can one beRich *******. He is 80, and about to die a very rich man anyway. The run in the Pepkor share price and TT liquidation being used.
Narcissist behavior.
#2924
Posted 06 September 2021 - 09:11 AM
Just Wiese strategy to squeeze a bit more out of the deal for himself
Rich *******. He is 80, and about to die a very rich man anyway. The run in the Pepkor share price and TT liquidation being used.
Narcissist behavior.
#2925
Posted 06 September 2021 - 09:05 AM
#2926
Posted 06 September 2021 - 09:03 AM
Just Wiese strategy to squeeze a bit more out of the deal for himself
#2927
Posted 06 September 2021 - 09:00 AM
#2928
Posted 06 September 2021 - 08:59 AM
what is positive for me is the letter of support SNH received from Hamiltonmore delays damn
#2929
Posted 06 September 2021 - 08:51 AM
more delays damn
Update On Global Litigation Settlement Proposal @ https://www.sharenet...0&seq=23&scode=
#2930
Posted 06 September 2021 - 08:50 AM
here is all goes to **** again
#2931
Posted 06 September 2021 - 08:48 AM
#2932
Posted 06 September 2021 - 08:27 AM
10 amWhat time can we expect the court to start?
#2933
Posted 06 September 2021 - 08:24 AM
What time can we expect the court to start?
#2934
Posted 06 September 2021 - 08:22 AM
Crazy how quick we went from wild valuations to possible liquidation on this forum haha. Kinda Steinhoff in a nutshell
I have no idea about SA law, but it seems a dangerous precedent to set, liquidating a company outside of your jurisdiction? I'll just let it happen I guess - here's to a good Monday all!
#2935
Posted 06 September 2021 - 06:58 AM
for me its simple. Pepco and Pepkor has almost no debt or very little. They have not paid dividends in a while and I can understand why. My prediction is that after a settlement is reached this week... they both will reinstate div payments then SNH will be in a position to pay off it's debt faster...after the restructuring of its debt. Watch this spaceThe only thing that bugs me is Steinhoff Liabilities.
Let say Steinhoff have R 13 billion in long term liabilities these long term liabilities would be guaranteed otherwise no bank would approve a loan without securities?
Lets say Steinhoff enters into Business rescue would this liabilities not become a burden on it’s subsidiaries if the subsidiaries was listed as a guarantee/security?
Wiping out some of Steinhoff’s liabilities?
Of sit ek die pot mis? 🤣😂
#2937
Posted 06 September 2021 - 05:01 AM
#2938
Posted 05 September 2021 - 09:39 PM
I have shares in Steinhoff and don't want a liquidation but I understand Tekkie Towns case and in some twisted way I support them for it.
Imagine trading in a brand new car for a better new version just to find out a year later its not brand new and was actually repaired after a car accident and sold to you as brand new. Wouldn't you go to the car dealership and burn them to the ground? Imagine losing a R 2 Billion shares value I would probable try to get them liquidated at all cost aswel.
Can someone please explain why they think steinhoff have a good chance not being liquidated?
From my view point its 50/50 and thats whether Tekkie Town can proof steinhoff is insolvent or solvent as that would trigger the way the law would handle it and which companies act would be use to deal with the liquidation.
Let's adjust your example a little bit, shall we? Imagine a fake car traded to you by the former manager of the dealership, who meanwhile was fired and investigated. Now the dealership sells good quality cars at an extremely low price because their reputation was tarnished. It is up to you to 1) sue the former manager for your losses as well or 2) even to sue the dealership for breach of contract since your contract was not with the manager but with the dealership.
Instead, you decide to ask a court to liquidate this dealership, knowing that the liquidation will lead to new customers (who were very happy at buying the new cars from the dealership for a very low price), having to return their cars and getting 0 in return. Basically, you are insisting on getting your old car back by damaging all the new buyers at the same time. Well knowing that by your actions you are dooming every new buyer to the same fate as you have been through.
I think it transforms Tekkie guys into selfish assholes. They could have got everything back in terms of money if:
1) They buy Steinhoff shares at the open market
2) They dismiss their liquidation application
3) Support the settlement proposal
This would have made them richer than before because Steinhoff shares would have probably doubled, plus they would also get money from the settlement. Also, they could have suggested that Steinhoff pays them in Steinhoff shares (at 10 cents a share), this would have turned them into substantial minority shareholders of Steinhoff and they would have become once again partial owners of the business. Hell, they could have even got voted into the directors of the company.
Instead, they prefer to ruin the party for everyone just because they got duped by a person who is no longer with the company.
#2939
Posted 05 September 2021 - 09:37 PM
Let say Steinhoff have R 13 billion in long term liabilities these long term liabilities would be guaranteed otherwise no bank would approve a loan without securities?
Lets say Steinhoff enters into Business rescue would this liabilities not become a burden on it’s subsidiaries if the subsidiaries was listed as a guarantee/security?
Wiping out some of Steinhoff’s liabilities?
Of sit ek die pot mis? 🤣😂
#2940
Posted 05 September 2021 - 09:12 PM
I am not a lawyer but from below i t seems it only applies if liquidation is taking place.
However liquidation has not been establish so first one needs to establish the company definition before moving forward.
Looks to me the TT lawyer are jumping the gun!
9. Continued application of previous Act to winding-up and liquidation
(1) Despite the repeal of the previous Act, until the date determined in terms of
subitem (4), Chapter 14 of that Act continues to apply with respect to the
winding- up and liquidation of companies under this Act, as if that Act had not
been repealed subject to subitems (2) and (3)
I don't think he is… if you look at steinhoff’s balance sheet you can clearly see it’s liabilities exceeds it’s assets for 2018, 2019, 2020 in those ratios it shows steinhoff is insolvent but can steinhoff proof that these legal battle fees and claims and other expenses occurred by the legal battles the cause that the company cant rebuild itself eg. Advisor, legal fees , Auditor fees , directors traveling expenses and the list goes on amounted to 5 billion rand in the last 2 years. The sad part about these professional fees is that those fees are enough to wipe out the entire loss in the equity statement.
The only good thing about an accumulated loss is the tax benefit…. So for me anything can go tomorrow in court.