From a valuation standpoint, probably most important paragraph:
“If the Group, having considered the findings in the PwC Report, including any consequential impacts, believes that the restatements to the total equity position of the Group as reflected in the unaudited half year results published on 29 June 2018 are materially out of line, the Group will inform the market as soon as it becomes aware of such material difference.”
Hi Burnt as well,
You are correct - I picked up on this statement (which incidentally was also included in the 1H18 unaudited financial statements).
I inquired in August 2018, and was told that while this cannot be ruled out, that the PwC work was very comprehensive and that the result was management erred towards to side of caution to clean up the Balance Sheet. In effect, further restatements are quite unlikely. The statement is included in the report for legal cover go indicate that there are some things that is not fully understood.
IMHO the likelihood of further material impairments/restatements are very small. The one possibility the cost of debt due to additional risk brought on by lawsuits needs to be managed. This in turn would realise further impairments as the WACC increases thereby increasing the discount rate of the future cash flows.
We have discussed the contingent liability on this platform. There is nothing further to add.
I have said this before. Steinhoff and the heavyweight restructuring management team they have acquired have many arrows to their bow.
This has nothing to do with shareholders having "studied at Harvard", "management being useless", speculators on this platform who have no skin in the game covering both basis on possible share price movement, or indeed any other misinformation.
What I will concede is that, if you cannot afford to lose your money, stay away from Steinhoff.
Best Regards
Captainfrom82