The VEB law suit was one of the biggest contentions impacting the valuation. this was an unknown factor impacting many analysts. the serious concern was the quantum. however VEB indicated that they are after a number of stakeholders and their target would be deloitte and the investment banks doing the listing- all of who have deeper pockets and liability malpractice insurance.
VEB stated categorically that they are non profit and aiming to assist shareholders derive some retribution. They do not want to bankrupt the company in this instance. looking at the quantum of shareholder value lost and a court settlement in the region of 2 billion euros, the shareholders will make very little from a court case victory and have more to gain from Steinhoff recovery, as can be seen with Tesco in the past few months.
the worse case scenario has already been factored in and more I guess with a R2.40 per share valuation.
market is awaiting JSE feedback on whether the share will be suspended.
I have been studying this as a case study to understand the market response, media impact, and company actions. have been correct on most instances except for 1 point related to internal governance - which Christo Wiese confirmed was lacking - including vagueness on the delegation of authority- but this has been disclosed already in viceroys report and worse case is that all the cash is spent and the total is an 8 billion euro impairment.
the viceroy revenue projections with 3 scenarios also point to a high road revenue scenario which they then price the share favourably. and if you go by there report and their worst case scenario you get Steinhoff trading at least r15 ish thumb suck.
will Steinhoff be solvent?
as this is enron like but not a complete enron- 130000 employees and many more shareholders impacted - there is a market need to save the company. PIC could step in acquire all the debt; Naspers sitting on a cash pile could purchase the entire business at R15 a share and this would still be a steal to get the entire supply chain and logistics and footprint with management staff. imagine the power of online and store footprint with a captured target market.
I worry about Mattress firm- but they have many options- which are already in play. there is no reason why Pepco pundland and other businesses cant be introduced quickly to the usa now that you have a USA presence...
there are still many options.
the way forward:
Steinhoff has bought time as there is a criminal investigation not just a delay with financial representation. Also- money misappropriated can be traced and recovered al beit in 10%. the interesting aspect is that Christo Wiese is relate dto the off balance sheet structures and Steinhoff can go after his money- as can be seen with the recent recovery of funds. we all rather see Christo as a loser more so than the farm workers who have saved all their lives.
I have been buying Steinhoff as funds avail. this is part of my high risk portfolio. I will continue to buy even until suspension where I expect then share may drop to 20c. suspension is not always permanent....this will however mean funds are locked away for 2 years....but this is unlikely as Discovery and a number of private buyers have been mopping up the shares daily. I would love a detailed analysis of the shareholding changes and an indication of the stockpilers. Steinhoff have refused my request for shareholder information